Trump vetoes resolution to curb war powers against Iran

Source: Axios - View Original Article
Published: May 06, 2020
Category:
Bias Rating:

69% Liberal


Bias Score Calculation:


Policies:

Iran

Sentiments

96% "We live in a hostile world of evolving threats, and the Constitution recognizes that the President must be able to anticipate our adversaries' next ..."
86% "Iran responded by launching a series of missiles at our forces stationed in Iraq.""
78% "Today, I vetoed S.J. Res.""
72% "The resolution implies that the President's constitutional authority to use military force is limited to defense of the United States and its forces against ..."
66% "Why it matters: The bipartisan measure came after Trump ordered a strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in January, bringing the two nations ..."
60% "Four months ago, I took decisive action to eliminate Qassem Soleimani while he was in Iraq.""
58% "What he's saying:""
56% "Contrary to the resolution, the United States is not engaged in the use of force against Iran.""

We have listed the top 10 sentiments. More sentiments do exist. Please review the full article for more information.



*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderate-left

Neutral

Moderate-right

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

100%

100%

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

96% : We live in a hostile world of evolving threats, and the Constitution recognizes that the President must be able to anticipate our adversaries' next moves and take swift and decisive action in response.
86% : 68, which purported to direct me to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces in hostilities against Iran.
86% : 68 is based on misunderstandings of facts and law.
86% : Iran responded by launching a series of missiles at our forces stationed in Iraq.
78% : "Today, I vetoed S.J. Res.
72% : The resolution implies that the President's constitutional authority to use military force is limited to defense of the United States and its forces against imminent attack.
66% : Why it matters: The bipartisan measure came after Trump ordered a strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in January, bringing the two nations to the brink of war.
60% : Four months ago, I took decisive action to eliminate Qassem Soleimani while he was in Iraq.
58% : What he's saying:
56% : Contrary to the resolution, the United States is not engaged in the use of force against Iran.
55% : The few Republicans who voted for it played right into their hands.
53% : President Trump on Wednesday vetoed a war powers resolution that would have curbed his ability to direct military action against Iran without Congress' authorization.
52% : That is incorrect.
51% : 68 would have greatly harmed the President's ability to protect the United States, its allies, and its partners.
48% : That's what I did!
46% : Further, the strike against Soleimani was fully authorized by law, including by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 and Article II of the Constitution.
45% : Finally, S.J. Res.
38% : In addition, S.J. Res.
30% : No one was killed by these attacks.
23% : Congress should not have passed this resolution. "
12% : This was a very insulting resolution, introduced by Democrats as part of a strategy to win an election on November 3 by dividing the Republican Party.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap