Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to New York City Gun Ordinance

Source: The Seattle Times - View Original Article
Published: Apr 29, 2020
Category:
Bias Rating:

68% Conservative


Bias Score Calculation:


Policies:

Gun Control

Sentiments

85% "In particular, the majority said that it declined to rule on a challenge to the amended regulation, which the plaintiffs said still violated the ..."
83% "Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch and, for the most part, Justice Clarence Thomas, issued a 31-page dissent.""
79% " The city disputed the interpretation of the new regulation.""
77% "But it prohibited them from taking their guns to second homes and shooting ranges outside the city, even when the guns were unloaded and ..."
76% "Exactly what the Second Amendment protects has been in dispute ever since, partly because Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision included ..."
73% "The city's travel restriction burdened the very right recognized in Heller, he wrote.""
71% "He added that the case was an easy one.""
69% "If that is true, there is cause for concern.""

We have listed the top 10 sentiments. More sentiments do exist. Please review the full article for more information.



*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderate-left

Neutral

Moderate-right

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

100%

100%

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

85% : In particular, the majority said that it declined to rule on a challenge to the amended regulation, which the plaintiffs said still violated the Second Amendment by forbidding gun owners "to stop for coffee, gas, food or restroom breaks on the way to their second homes or shooting ranges outside of the city.
83% : Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch and, for the most part, Justice Clarence Thomas, issued a 31-page dissent.
79% : " The city disputed the interpretation of the new regulation.
77% : But it prohibited them from taking their guns to second homes and shooting ranges outside the city, even when the guns were unloaded and locked in containers separate from ammunition.
76% : Exactly what the Second Amendment protects has been in dispute ever since, partly because Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision included an important limiting passage that was almost certainly the price of Justice Anthony Kennedy's fifth and deciding vote in the case.
73% : "The city's travel restriction burdened the very right recognized in Heller," he wrote.
71% : When the court agreed to hear the case, the possibility of such a ruling alarmed gun control proponents, who urged New York City officials to repeal the regulation.
71% : He added that the case was an easy one.
69% : But aside from one follow-up case in 2010, the court has not said more on the scope of that right.
69% : If that is true, there is cause for concern.
67% : The city did so, and state lawmakers later enacted a law that seemed to make it impossible for city officials to change their minds.
65% : The new case, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York, No. 18-280, was brought by the association and three city residents.
64% : But the court is very likely to agree to hear a new Second Amendment case soon.
63% : The Supreme Court seemed unlikely to uphold the law and its decision in the case would have given it an opportunity to elaborate on the scope of Second Amendment rights.
61% : WASHINGTON --
61% : The challengers had lost in U.S. District Court in Manhattan and in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where a unanimous three-judge panel had ruled that the ordinance passed constitutional muster under the Heller decision.
58% : "This is not a close question," he wrote.
57% : It takes four votes to add a case to the court's docket, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion, indicated that he was ready to join the three dissenting justices in voting to grant review in one of what he said were "several Second Amendment cases with petitions" awaiting action from the court.
56% : "The court properly recognized that the only claims the petitioners ever brought no longer present a live case, because the challenged city rule no longer exists," Johnson said in a statement.
56% : The regulation, Alito wrote, violated the Second Amendment.
56% : "Nothing in our opinion," Scalia wrote, "should be taken to cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."
55% : It said that the case was not moot and that the regulation flatly violated the court's Second Amendment precedents.
52% : "History provides no support for a restriction of this type.
51% : James E. Johnson, New York City's corporation counsel, said the court's ruling was "just right.
48% : The question, the majority said, should be addressed by the appeals court.
45% : "The question is, in a word, moot."
45% : "And once we granted review in this case," he continued, "the city's public safety concerns evaporated.
42% : In his dissent, Alito accused the city of litigation gamesmanship in attempting to make the case moot after the court granted review.
40% : "The court should address that issue soon," he wrote.
38% : The majority, in its unsigned opinion, left open the possibility that a lower court could yet revive the case.
32% : "The answer follows directly from Heller.
32% : In that 2008 decision, District of Columbia v. Heller, a five-justice majority established an individual right to keep guns in the home for self-defense, imperiling gun control laws around the nation.
28% : The majority opinion was unsigned and just two pages long.
28% : We are told that the mode of review in this case is representative of the way Heller has been treated in the lower courts.
26% : The Supreme Court said Monday that it would not decide what would have been its first decision on the scope of the Second Amendment in almost a decade, finding that New York City's repeal of the gun control regulation under challenge had made the matter moot.
26% : Kavanaugh wrote that he agreed with Alito that lower courts may not be properly applying the Supreme Court's Second Amendment precedents.
24% : The New York City regulation, which appeared to be unique in the nation, had allowed residents with so-called premises licenses to take their guns to one of seven shooting ranges in the city.
20% : Since the Heller decision, lower courts have largely upheld state and local gun control laws.
17% : The majority did not address that issue, but the three dissenting justices did.
6% : The city's public safety arguments were weak on their face, were not substantiated in any way, and were accepted below with no serious probing.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap